Investing in emerging technology in the age of digital disruption
- 26 September, 2012 22:00
While there is an insatiable appetite for new technologies that fuel growth, most emerging technology investments languish -- and ultimately fail. But, the ones that succeed cause rapid and dramatic disruptions that would have exceeded our imaginations a decade ago.
Past disruption followed a classic pattern: Innovators created a new product or service at a dramatically lower price point than currently exists. Eventually, buyers abandon the old products for cheaper upstarts. But in today's world, digital disruption happens in the blink of an eye. Consider Amazon.com's disruption of the print media industry and Apple's disruption of the music industry via iTunes. Compared to other disruptions, these happened almost overnight.
Digital disruption has executives rethinking competitive strategy, and has sent product strategists scrambling for ideas on how to use digital and software capabilities to leverage new products and complement existing ones. While firms are counting on these technologies to have a big impact, they tend to fail, wasting resources and damaging relationships. In fact, in 2011, only 9% of enterprise architects said their businesses were completely satisfied with the level of new technology introduction, and 26% were totally dissatisfied.
In Forrester's Emerging Technology Playbook, my colleagues and I maintain that in order to compete with digital disruptors, firms must take a new investment approach to emerging technology.
Step 1: Categorise and Prioritisze Opportunities
To justify investment, firms must realize that emerging technology impacts their business in different ways and requires different approaches. For example:
• Business critical investments require project discipline. Technology investments that have a high operational impact and low potential for growth typically touch critical systems and processes. These require project management discipline to ensure that inappropriately managed risk and scope creep do not jeopardize service or create delays.
• Back-office investments require tangible returns. Investments in back-office and support areas (such as human resources and infrastructure) almost always have two objectives: be more efficient and reduce service cost. The bottom-line nature of these investments requires tangible benefits and a relatively short payback.
• Strategic technology investments are part of larger business transformation. Strategic emerging technology opportunities have both high business growth potential and operational impact. They often require bet the business moves where failure is not an option. For this reason, it's critical that these decisions be part of a larger business transformation program that deeply considers all elements of change needed for success.
• Future potential investments require experimentation. Technology investments with low operational impact but high growth potential offer the most opportunity to experiment because failure is not catastrophic and potential benefits are high. Ideas that begin as experiments in future potential can mature into other impact areas before commercialization. Success means the potential for more profit, and if significant enough, an initial investment in future potential could lead to substantial business transformation.
Step 2: Evaluate Current Architecture Alignment
Hot opportunities create considerable pressure to deliver commercial capabilities; however, failures are commonly caused by a lack of understanding. Forrester suggests first developing an opportunity road map that matches emerging technology capabilities to tactical and strategic business needs.
To leverage emerging technology in terms of benefits, timing, cost, and risk rather than focus on the technology, identify: 1) the business evolutions that will be unlocked by the emerging technology, 2) the strategic and tactical business requirements that are necessary for successful implementation, and 3) whether or not your firm has the appropriate skills, process, capacity to carry out that implementation.
Step 3: Select the Best Funding Approach
Once you determine opportunities that can be aligned with existing architecture, you are ready for initial investment. Forrester suggests utilizing the below technology investment framework to determine the appropriate business case approach. The framework identifies our recommendations, alternatives, and approaches not recommended for each category of investment. For example, we do not recommend using a transformation program to invest in back-office support opportunities, as programs that are typically show and thorough in their analysis and prevent capturing the rapid return on investment that this class of technology investment demands.
For each recommendation, remember that:
1. Investments in critical opportunities are best justified as part of a comprehensive business case.
2. Investments in back-office opportunities require tangible benefits in a definite and short time frame.
3. Business transformation programs must be willing to absorb the opportunity and justify the cost of strategic investments.
4. Emerging technology opportunities in future business potential require incubation and experimentation.
Business evolutions unlocked by emerging technology can be chaotic, but through a deep understanding of high-priority opportunities and smart, venture-style investments, you can keep your company relevant in the era of digital disruption.
Brian Hopkins is a Principal Analyst at Forrester Research serving Enterprise Architecture professionals.
Follow CIO on
Download CIO for your tablet here.
Click here to subscribe to CIO.
Sign up to receive free CIO newsletters.
Send news tips to firstname.lastname@example.org
Brace for change: An interview with Tony Hayes of ISACA
Rethinking the worst case
The brand called CIO
Motorola turns to the Moto G's price to reserve its smartphone fortunes
Virtual desktop computing service: The next cloud disruptor?
The Evolution and Value of Purpose-Built Backup Appliances
Customers today are still grappling with subpar backup performance as systems outstrip the allotted backup window time. Strategies for data protection and recovery continue to be dictated by aggressive SLAs, rapid recovery, and ease of integration in existing environments. As a result, firms have started to embrace more disk-based data protection technologies, including purpose-built backup appliances (PBBAs) to protect and recover data and applications. This white paper explores the measurable benefits of PBBA systems for customers, with a focus on the increased use and adoption patterns of both integrated and targeted systems.
Siemens Redefines Efficiency
Siemens is leading the migration to a smarter energy grid by enabling utilities to collect and analyse data from the new generation of smart meters, providing both utilities and their customers usable information to make smarter energy decisions. In this case study, we look at how they could provision full stack environments quickly and flexibly leveraging a shared hardware model, and one the delivered performance and scale to meet large testing requirements.
Efficient Data Management in Three Simple Steps
Gartner reports that Business Intelligence, Mobile Technologies and Cloud Computing rank 1-2-3 as the 2013 Global CIO Technology Priorities. These three trends, labelled the “Perfect Storm” of new technologies, are transforming every link in the IT value chain, promising to deliver more efficient, responsive and dynamic IT operations. But this also means massive shifts in the way IT applications and services are created, deployed and maintained. This whitepaper aims to help you begin the journey to efficient modern data management