We all like to think of ourselves as being ‘strategic’.
CIO’s annual 'State of the CIO 2016' survey found that “IT executives tend to be optimistic that their roles will eventually become more strategic”. Specifically, “68 percent indicated they would be focused on growth-oriented activities” in three to five years. Respondents held a similar expectation in CIO’s 2015 survey. They will probably do the same next year. Being ‘more strategic’ is a career requirement for many of us.
The problem here is understanding what ‘being strategic’ actually means. “Growth-oriented activities” can cover just about anything for the modern CIO. Being strategic translates as ‘having a strategy’ which means knowing what a strategy is in the context of your specific domain. I teach a strategic thinking class and see people have all sorts of trouble understanding what strategy means to them.
Richard Rumelt, ‘the strategist’s strategist’, gives us the starting point in his 2011 book ‘Good Strategy/Bad Strategy’:
“The core content of a strategy is a diagnosis of the situation at hand, the creation or identification of a guiding policy for dealing with the critical difficulties and a set of coherent actions”
For CIO’s to be more strategic, they will need to have identified the critical elements of their environment. This often comes down to what frame the CIO is using to explain what is going on in their world and why. This is not a straightforward exercise. The nexus of cloud, digital, mobile, social and analytics technologies have changed the world of the CIO irrevocably. The identity of the CIO in relation to the rest of the enterprise is in flux.
Every CIO has the opportunity to become more strategic in 2016. Their challenge is in identifying those few areas where, if they concentrate sufficient force, they can achieve a breakthrough success.
In her 2015 book ‘The New IT’ Jill Dyche identified six archetypes based on the individual’s focus areas, structures and behaviour:Read more: IT leaders need a more agile approach to support marketing: Gartner
- The Tactical CIO keeps the lights on
- The Order Taking CIO masters the art of release management
- The Aligning CIO becomes intimate with evolving business initiatives
- The Data Provisioning CIO manages data as an asset
- The Brokering CIO builds a strong technology ecosystem
- The IT Everywhere CIO shifts the control of technology to those who use it
Each of these archetypes will apply a different strategy. A strategic CIO is a person who has effectively diagnosed their domain, where effective means they can successfully intervene. We live in a business culture where we associate the executive with being the mistress of her domain but this is less common than we’d like to think.
In his 1997 book ‘The Innovators Dilemma’, Clayton Christensen wrote about the resource dependence theory of allocation within a firm:
“While managers may think they control the flow of resources in their firms, in the end it is really customers and investors who dictate how money will be spent because companies with investment patterns that don't satisfy customers and investors don't survive. Companies can succeed in disruptive technologies when their managers align their organizations with the forces of resource dependence, rather than ignoring or fighting them”
As Christensen observed:Read more: Analytics now a boardroom conversation
“This is a most disquieting thought… we are there to manage, to make a difference, to formulate and implement strategy, to accelerate growth and improve profits. Resource dependence violates our very reason for being.”
This suggests that the ‘critical difficulties’ a strategic CIO must deal with may well be a line manager buried deep in the organisation that, in accordance with the prevailing doctrine of management culture, blocks the CIO’s strategic actions. Or it may be an influential supplier or partner. ‘Being strategic’ is contextual to the relationship between each CIO and her organisation. And in terms of the relative powerlessness that the theory of resource dependence implies, ‘being strategic’ for the CIO relates to how much change she is able to introduce into the system.
In this sense, every CIO has the opportunity to become more strategic in 2016. Their challenge is in identifying those few areas where, if they concentrate sufficient force, they can achieve a breakthrough success. This is important because I’ve seen many people fall prey to all sorts of mumbo jumbo when trying to develop strategic capability. We seem to believe we need some mystical array of frameworks, roadmaps and one pagers to get the title ‘strategic’.
This is what makes Rumelt’s formula so helpful. We can all apply it to what we do. A simple test for whether we have a strategy or not is if there is clarity around the obstacles preventing us from obtaining our aims. If there are no obstacles, then no strategy is required because we should have a clear path forward. Lack of specified obstacles indicates we have a set of stretch goals or a diffuse ‘future state’. But it won’t be a strategy.
If we assume for a moment that Christensen’s assessment of resource dependence is an operant factor in our business environment, how might one of Dyche’s strategic ‘Aligning’ CIO’s proceed with, say, the evolution of enterprise mobility?Read more: Why enterprise social platforms are an organisation’s primary innovation platform
Ovum’s Principal Analyst Richard Absalom laid out some of the main trends shaping this domain in his 2016 report ‘2016 Trends to Watch: Enterprise Mobility’:
“The overriding theme, and one that has an impact in practically every other area, is that the market is set to be driven by applications: enterprises are aiming to leverage them to exploit the full power of the mobile devices in the hands of employees, and supply-side vendors and service providers of all kinds are vying to meet that demand by supplying apps and app management and security solutions.”
Where there is any technology situation driven by apps in the hands of employees and fuelled by the full weight of supply-side forces, the first thing that a CIO will have to identify is the extent to which she can meaningfully intervene. Absalom stated:
“Following a period of heavy consolidation, the software space is becoming dominated by IT mega-vendors, and alongside major telecoms operators, these giant brands will use their reach and resources to take enterprise mobility management into the IT mainstream and grow the overall size of the market.”The 2016 CIO100 report: Full speed ahead
Next: The aligning CIO