Menu
Menu
Spark acknowledges Commerce Commission proceedings on operational and billing issues

Spark acknowledges Commerce Commission proceedings on operational and billing issues

“These errors were for the most part an unfortunate and unintended consequence of some of the change we’ve been through and we regret that they occurred,” says Spark managing director Simon Moutter.

Simon Moutter - Managing Director, Spark New Zealand

Simon Moutter - Managing Director, Spark New Zealand

The New Zealand Commerce Commission has informed Spark it intends to file court proceedings against it under the Fair Trading Act 1986 in relation to three separate historical operational and billing issues.

The issues relate to an equipment fault in 2015 that affected data billing for a small percentage of broadband customers; incorrect implementation of a ‘welcome credit’ when joining Spark for some fibre broadband customers during 2016; and a billing implementation issue relating to a 30-day notice period when customers left Spark.

Spark says it will review the Commerce Commission’s proceedings and has yet to determine the position it will take in response.

Although the Commerce Commission has outlined the maximum possible penalties available under law for each of the charges, it has not yet advised Spark of the penalties it will actually seek. The decision as to any actual penalties will ultimately be one for the court.

To give some context to the impact on customers, Spark says the 2015 equipment fault issue has been resolved for all 5,325 affected customers (with credits or compensation totalling $216,937), as has the 2016 ‘welcome credit’ issue for all 463 affected customers (with credits totalling $46,300).

The 30-day billing issue affected a number of customers who left Spark over a three-year period and Spark has since given refunds to most of them. As of last week, there were up to 8,829 former customers, owed a total of $304,070, who despite Spark’s best efforts to contact them had not responded. More than 90% of these former customers are owed less than $100.

“These were all system-based errors caused by genuine mistakes with no malicious intent involved on the part of Spark,” says Spark managing director Simon Moutter.

“That being said, we are deeply disappointed that these issues have affected our customers.”

“Our preference has consistently been to settle these matters and avoid court proceedings,” says Moutter, in a statement.

“To this end we have held extensive discussions with the Commerce Commission, including our suggestion that we make a settlement payment (possibly in the form of further charitable donations) to acknowledge our errors.

“Given the unintentional nature of the errors involved and the extensive actions already taken by us to put things right for our customers, we are obviously disappointed the Commerce Commission is now embarking on what will be a costly, time-consuming court process for both parties.”

“As a business, we’ve been through a massive amount of change over the last few years and this has significantly improved our customer service delivery,” says Moutter.

“These errors were for the most part an unfortunate and unintended consequence of some of the change we’ve been through and we regret that they occurred.”

“We have spent time learning from these issues, amending processes, updating training and staff resources – and we continue to work hard to ensure these kinds of errors don’t recur in future. We have made every effort to ensure that customers have received all amounts owing to them and will continue to do so,” says Moutter.

Spark says it has already applied credits to the accounts of all impacted customers and, for former customers, has made extensive efforts to return all money owed so they receive the benefit of their credit.

Some of these customers left Spark a considerable time ago and their contact details may have since changed, it adds.

While Spark has already refunded many of these former customers over the past 12 months, it has been seeking to reach more of them as part of its “Make Sure You Get What’s Yours” consumer campaign launched in May 2018.

Through this campaign, Spark says it has has so far returned over $1.1 million to customers in credits owing. SSpark says this relates to a wide range of circumstances, not just the 30-day billing issue.

Spark also made donations last year to various charities totalling around $268,000, in recognition of the interest it was likely to earn (over a sustained period) on unclaimed credit balances arising from the 30-day billing issue – because it says it did not intend to profit from this issue.

Get the latest on digital transformation: Sign up for  CIO newsletters for regular updates on CIO news, career tips, views and events. Follow CIO New Zealand on Twitter:@cio_nz

Join the CIO New Zealand group on LinkedIn. The group is open to CIOs, IT Directors, COOs, CTOs and senior IT managers.

Join the newsletter!

Or

Sign up to gain exclusive access to email subscriptions, event invitations, competitions, giveaways, and much more.

Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. View our privacy policy before signing up.

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags change managementTelecommunicationsdisruptiondigital dividecustomer focusSimon MoutterSpark New ZealandDXFair Trading Act 1986

More about Commerce CommissionSparkTwitter

Show Comments